Some variations on a theme. Instead of attaching the 360 camera to the mirror, I'm trying some different locations. This time it was attached to the wind deflector mounted above the windshield:
Monday, 11 June 2018
Sunday, 10 June 2018
A Long Ride Home
Last week I was in Edmonton at the Skills Canada National Competition. We were there for IT & Networking, but they have everything from metal work and carpentry to 3d modelling and fashion on hand. One of the competitions I was drawn back to again and again was motive power where competitors were working on everything from outboard motors to a variety of motorbikes.
They had Kawasaki KX450s up on a block as well as some lovely Yamaha MT09s. Both Yamaha and Kawasaki were sponsors at Skills Canada - which kinda makes you wonder where that Canadian manufacturer CanAm went, but then judging by the long faces of Team Quebec throughout the competition, perhaps they too find the idea of participating in a Canadian event to be bothersome. How every other province and territory, many of them strongly represented by Canadians from all over the world as well as a strong contingent of aboriginal tradespeople, could be so positive about Skills Canada while Team Quebec looked like they were at the dentist the whole time was both baffling and frustrating.
Competitors in the motive power competition were diagnosing faults and doing maintenance under the watchful eyes of multiple judges. This (of course) got me daydreaming of alternate ways of getting back to Ontario after the competition that didn't involve air travel. Though I can't complain as I got bumped up to bulkhead behind first class and spent the entire flight back with Sherry Holmes.
We wrapped up Skills Canada on Wednesday, June 6th just after lunch in Edmonton. From there it's just over thirty-three hundred kilometres home.
The MT09 isn't exactly designed for long distance trips, but if I could manage doing three tanks of gas (the MT does about 190kms/to a tank) a day I'd be averaging close to 600kms daily. That means a six day blitz across most of North America and around the Great Lakes to get home on eighteen tanks of fuel.
The only thing I'd need for the bike is a tail bag for essentials and then I'd be off. It's Canada in June, so the clothing options would have to be pretty dynamic as I'd be likely to see everything from 40°C heat to possible snow. As it happens, Aerostich is just over half way back in Deluth, Minnesota, and they have a Roadcrafter suit that happens to match the MT09's funky paint scheme pretty well. It would only take a slight modification to the trip to pass through there. If I'm looking for something that'll get me through the madness that is Canadian weather, the Roadcrafter's the thing. The trick would be to get across The Prairies without freezing or overheating before enjoying the final fifteen hundred kilometres in and around The Great Lakes in a made to fit super-suit. It'd make for a formidable before and after comparison.
Edmonton was packed with motorcycle shops. We saw everything from Indian/KTM to Ducati and the usual Hawg shops. There is a lot of disposable income in Edmonton. The MT09's grey with high-vis paintwork is right on trend with a lot of Japanese helmets at the moment. I'd have a fine choice of matching Shoei or Arai lids to choose from.
Funny how just seeing a bike after days spent on planes and buses gets me dreaming about riding again, even if it's a six day slog over a quick three hour flight. I suspect that most motorcyclists have this perverse nature about them.
They had Kawasaki KX450s up on a block as well as some lovely Yamaha MT09s. Both Yamaha and Kawasaki were sponsors at Skills Canada - which kinda makes you wonder where that Canadian manufacturer CanAm went, but then judging by the long faces of Team Quebec throughout the competition, perhaps they too find the idea of participating in a Canadian event to be bothersome. How every other province and territory, many of them strongly represented by Canadians from all over the world as well as a strong contingent of aboriginal tradespeople, could be so positive about Skills Canada while Team Quebec looked like they were at the dentist the whole time was both baffling and frustrating.
Competitors in the motive power competition were diagnosing faults and doing maintenance under the watchful eyes of multiple judges. This (of course) got me daydreaming of alternate ways of getting back to Ontario after the competition that didn't involve air travel. Though I can't complain as I got bumped up to bulkhead behind first class and spent the entire flight back with Sherry Holmes.
We wrapped up Skills Canada on Wednesday, June 6th just after lunch in Edmonton. From there it's just over thirty-three hundred kilometres home.
The MT09 isn't exactly designed for long distance trips, but if I could manage doing three tanks of gas (the MT does about 190kms/to a tank) a day I'd be averaging close to 600kms daily. That means a six day blitz across most of North America and around the Great Lakes to get home on eighteen tanks of fuel.
The only thing I'd need for the bike is a tail bag for essentials and then I'd be off. It's Canada in June, so the clothing options would have to be pretty dynamic as I'd be likely to see everything from 40°C heat to possible snow. As it happens, Aerostich is just over half way back in Deluth, Minnesota, and they have a Roadcrafter suit that happens to match the MT09's funky paint scheme pretty well. It would only take a slight modification to the trip to pass through there. If I'm looking for something that'll get me through the madness that is Canadian weather, the Roadcrafter's the thing. The trick would be to get across The Prairies without freezing or overheating before enjoying the final fifteen hundred kilometres in and around The Great Lakes in a made to fit super-suit. It'd make for a formidable before and after comparison.
Edmonton was packed with motorcycle shops. We saw everything from Indian/KTM to Ducati and the usual Hawg shops. There is a lot of disposable income in Edmonton. The MT09's grey with high-vis paintwork is right on trend with a lot of Japanese helmets at the moment. I'd have a fine choice of matching Shoei or Arai lids to choose from.
Funny how just seeing a bike after days spent on planes and buses gets me dreaming about riding again, even if it's a six day slog over a quick three hour flight. I suspect that most motorcyclists have this perverse nature about them.
Beautiful Sunset Ride
T'was a lovely evening and everyone was napping or having quiet time, so I pulled the Tiger out and went for a cool, sunset ride up and down the Grand River. Almost no traffic at the end of the day, but lots of bugs on my visor when I got back.
Here are some photos of the ride. If you're curious about how I'm doing this, I'm getting an article on it published in Adventure Bike Rider, but in the meantime you can find the how-to on my photography blog here.
All photos taken on a Ricoh Theta clamped to the wing mirror. Screen grabs were post-processed in Adobe Lightroom. The 'little planet' photos were uploaded through the Theta software to the Theta website and then it's a one button click to get the tiny planet look:
Here are some photos of the ride. If you're curious about how I'm doing this, I'm getting an article on it published in Adventure Bike Rider, but in the meantime you can find the how-to on my photography blog here.
All photos taken on a Ricoh Theta clamped to the wing mirror. Screen grabs were post-processed in Adobe Lightroom. The 'little planet' photos were uploaded through the Theta software to the Theta website and then it's a one button click to get the tiny planet look:
Post from RICOH THETA. - Spherical Image - RICOH THETA
Post from RICOH THETA. - Spherical Image - RICOH THETA
Triumph Tiger sunset ride - Spherical Image - RICOH THETA
Saturday, 19 May 2018
Tiger Motorcycle Pixel Art
My son came up with this pixel art 8-bit image of the two of us on the Tiger. I'd asked him for something I could use as the icon on the website (they appear in the tab at the top of the browser).
I did a bit of beveling on it in Photoshop and then cropped and reshaped it into a square image under 100kb (requirements for an icon).
The end result looks pretty good, I think. If you're reading this on a browser with tabs, you should see Max's 8-bit art at the top. From the original art on the right I made up a poster, then cropped the bike with us on it, then made the square icon you see at the top.
Sunday, 13 May 2018
A New Roof
My son's ever growing head meant that his Shark Raw helmet has gotten too small. He tried out my Desmo the other day and liked it, so I started thinking about a second French lid. Thanks to some excellent service by ChromeBurner, I've now got a new Roof!
Rather than go with a Desmo again, I thought I'd go for the classic Boxer. This helmet feels a bit more old school than the Desmo. The chin guard latches snap on to lock it down and the visor and chin guard mechanism seems much simpler. The Desmo works on two different cams and the mechanisms to raise the visor and chin guard swing on two seperate arcs; it's a complicated thing. The Boxer chin guard swings on the same hinge as the visor, both on a single pivot.
The Boxer is lighter, probably due to that simplicity. It's spacious and the visor feels as big as the one on the Desmo, which is one of my favourite things about Roof mechanical helmets, you never feel like you're looking through a letter-box opening. Even when they're closed they feel spacious and the view is first class.
I miss the one touch chin opening on the Desmo. The two button Boxer design is fiddly and nothing like as smooth and easy to use, though once I get used to it, switching between open and closed while in motion shouldn't be too hard.
The best thing about the Boxer is the visor I got with it. The less fiddly hinge means switching visors is much less complex than in the Desmo, and this iridium visor with it's layered tint and reflective surface is a joy to look through.
I spent ten minutes looking for a fancy tool like the Desmo requires to change visors only to discover the Boxer's visor snaps in. Riding into the sun is easily manageable thanks to the range of tint across the visor, but the tint is so light you can still see well in shadowy areas too. I suspect it'll be easier to see through than the dark smoked visor I have on the Desmo.
I enjoyed my ride today with the Boxer. It's an eye catching helmet that got a lot of looks. The view out of it is expansive and I think it ventilates better than the Desmo - I never once got fog on the visor, a constant thing with the Desmo which I often ride with cracked open. It's comfortable, light and at least as quiet as the old Desmo. It seems to have the same aerodynamic qualities too with no tugging or turbulence and, like the Desmo, seems impervious to cross winds.
All of this has me wondering what the new RO32 Desmo and Boxer Carbon are like. The RO32 promises a quieter, more comfortable experience, which would make my favourite helmet even better. The orange and black one looks fantastic, and even offers the iridium reflective visor now that I'm enjoying so much on the Boxer. The Carbon Boxer is even more astonishingly lighter and looks to have a more complex locking mechanism and a higher level of finish than the regular Boxer.
Chromeburner, based in the Netherlands, got the Roof to me here in Canada within ten days of ordering and the whole process was very transparent, letting me know exactly where it is at any time. When I contacted them, customer service was accurate and immediate, international shipping was free and duties paid were cheaper than I expected; I'll happily use Chromeburner again.
I'm in the process of selling off some old helmets that don't fit or get used much, which means the new Roof cost even less. All in with taxes, duties and shipping, the Boxer with iridium visor cost less than $550 Canadian. There are no equivalent helmets for sale in Canada. Most modular/flip up helmets only rise to the forehead, meaning they are very uncomfortable if ridden open at any speed as they catch the wind like a sail. They also tend to be much heavier than the Roof options. The Roof chinbar rotates to the back of the helmet, out of the wind blast. In open/jet mode, you often forget it's there until you need it. No buffeting or awkward weight distribution to worry about. Next time my son and I are out two-up, we'll both be in Roofs.
I'd love a Carbon Boxer, but it's an expensive proposition. I suspect a new-model Desmo will be next on my lid-wishlist. It's nice to have found a helmet that is light, comfortable and meets my picky needs around large viewing area, the flexibility to work as an open or close faced helmet and manages to do all that while still meeting full face safety standards. The fact that I love the aeronautical look of these things is a nice bonus. I just wish I had a chance to try out the new Desmo and Carbon Boxer.
Rather than go with a Desmo again, I thought I'd go for the classic Boxer. This helmet feels a bit more old school than the Desmo. The chin guard latches snap on to lock it down and the visor and chin guard mechanism seems much simpler. The Desmo works on two different cams and the mechanisms to raise the visor and chin guard swing on two seperate arcs; it's a complicated thing. The Boxer chin guard swings on the same hinge as the visor, both on a single pivot.
The Boxer is lighter, probably due to that simplicity. It's spacious and the visor feels as big as the one on the Desmo, which is one of my favourite things about Roof mechanical helmets, you never feel like you're looking through a letter-box opening. Even when they're closed they feel spacious and the view is first class.
I miss the one touch chin opening on the Desmo. The two button Boxer design is fiddly and nothing like as smooth and easy to use, though once I get used to it, switching between open and closed while in motion shouldn't be too hard.
The best thing about the Boxer is the visor I got with it. The less fiddly hinge means switching visors is much less complex than in the Desmo, and this iridium visor with it's layered tint and reflective surface is a joy to look through.
I spent ten minutes looking for a fancy tool like the Desmo requires to change visors only to discover the Boxer's visor snaps in. Riding into the sun is easily manageable thanks to the range of tint across the visor, but the tint is so light you can still see well in shadowy areas too. I suspect it'll be easier to see through than the dark smoked visor I have on the Desmo.
I enjoyed my ride today with the Boxer. It's an eye catching helmet that got a lot of looks. The view out of it is expansive and I think it ventilates better than the Desmo - I never once got fog on the visor, a constant thing with the Desmo which I often ride with cracked open. It's comfortable, light and at least as quiet as the old Desmo. It seems to have the same aerodynamic qualities too with no tugging or turbulence and, like the Desmo, seems impervious to cross winds.
All of this has me wondering what the new RO32 Desmo and Boxer Carbon are like. The RO32 promises a quieter, more comfortable experience, which would make my favourite helmet even better. The orange and black one looks fantastic, and even offers the iridium reflective visor now that I'm enjoying so much on the Boxer. The Carbon Boxer is even more astonishingly lighter and looks to have a more complex locking mechanism and a higher level of finish than the regular Boxer.
Closer than ever to living my Jo Sinnott dream... |
I'm in the process of selling off some old helmets that don't fit or get used much, which means the new Roof cost even less. All in with taxes, duties and shipping, the Boxer with iridium visor cost less than $550 Canadian. There are no equivalent helmets for sale in Canada. Most modular/flip up helmets only rise to the forehead, meaning they are very uncomfortable if ridden open at any speed as they catch the wind like a sail. They also tend to be much heavier than the Roof options. The Roof chinbar rotates to the back of the helmet, out of the wind blast. In open/jet mode, you often forget it's there until you need it. No buffeting or awkward weight distribution to worry about. Next time my son and I are out two-up, we'll both be in Roofs.
I'd love a Carbon Boxer, but it's an expensive proposition. I suspect a new-model Desmo will be next on my lid-wishlist. It's nice to have found a helmet that is light, comfortable and meets my picky needs around large viewing area, the flexibility to work as an open or close faced helmet and manages to do all that while still meeting full face safety standards. The fact that I love the aeronautical look of these things is a nice bonus. I just wish I had a chance to try out the new Desmo and Carbon Boxer.
It was a nice ride up and down the banks of the Grand River today. You don't get to see any of that because the craptastic Samsung Gear360 I'm stuck with at the moment didn't film any of it because I couldn't see the pointlessly small and useless LEDs on it. I miss my Ricoh Theta! Add a ThetaV to my Boxer Carbon and Desmo RO32 wishlist. |
Saturday, 12 May 2018
A Perfect Ride
Sun's going down... |
The next day temperatures plunged and by the weekend we were looking at minus double digits and the snow was flying.
Yesterday was my first time back there since the end of November. The sun baked my back on the way over and then we sat out front sipping coffees and soaking up the rays.
A quick blast up and down The Forks made me realize how rusty I am with being in the right gear to make the most of a corner. I'll be working on that in the next few weeks.
The trip home with the sun still high in the sky promises more long summer riding days to come.
The corkscrew on The Forks. |
Sunday, 6 May 2018
Smart Helmets
Part of my day job involves building virtual and augmented reality sets for classrooms. I have built dozens of systems and have tried all sorts of different combinations of hardware, we even build software that uses this tech. I get virtual and augmented reality and I'm looking forward this fighter pilot technology finding its way into motorcycle helmets.
I saw a tweet today that suggests it's already here in the Cross Helmet. 360° peripheral awareness is a great idea that will no doubt save lives, and having hands free navigational information is another valuable safety feature, but I have a questions about this revolutionary lid.
Most of the articles I've read about the Cross Helmet are by tech websites that have a hard time containing their enthusiasm about disrupting existing industries. They typically suggest that motorcycle helmets haven't changed in decades and that they are low tech, unimaginative things created by Luddites. It'll take the blinding talents of a technology company to interrupt those conservative curmudgeons in the helmet industry (sorry, sometimes the hyperbole around high-tech companies gets a bit tiresome).
Helmets aren't supposed to be an infotainment system, they supposed to be a light-weight, effective protective item that operates in incredibly difficult circumstances. Helmet manufacturers have thrown everything imaginable at this problem, producing carbon fibre helmets and pushing materials engineering to the limit in creating the lightest, most protective lids possible. They've also applied modern aerodynamic analysis to their products, producing quieter, less buffeting protection than ever before. To call them uninspired and backwards simply isn't true.
The most concerning thing about the Cross Helmet isn't the wiz-bang technology in the thing, it's the thing itself. That is a massive lid. When was the last time you needed two hands to hold on to your helmet? This size is a function of all the technology crammed into it. A heads up display, rear facing camera, wireless connectivity, communications and the battery needed to power all that stuff weighs down the helmet and makes it big. The actual weight of it appears to be a mystery. Modern helmets weigh between one and two kilos, with the heaviest ones being mechanical flip top items with built in sun visors. I can't find a weight listed for the Cross Helmet anywhere, not even on their website.
I'm guessing, based on the size and tech in the thing that it'll come in at over twice the weight of what an average helmet does, which doesn't make it a very good helmet. On top of that, you're looking at a slab sided thing that looks like it'll catch cross winds like a sail. You might be able to see behind you and get navigational details, but you'll be stopping often because your neck can't take it any more.
I get that the first prototype of a new design is going to have problems; this is the worst smart helmet you'll ever see because it's the first one. As the tech gets smaller and designs improve, a smart helmet becomes a much more attractive idea, but I'm disinclined to dive into a (very) expensive helmet that is more of a concept than a usable thing.
Here is a list of some helmets currently on the market with their weights:
Arai DT-X 1619 grams (and check out the many technical details shared)
Roof Boxer Helmet 1650 grams (again with many technical details shared)
Roof Boxer Carbon 1550 grams (the lightest transformable/mechanical helmet I can find)
Nexx Carbon 1219 grams (the lightest helmet I can find)
Shark Evoline 1960 grams (the heaviest helmet I could find)
The lightest of them use every materials engineering trick in the book to produce helmets that meet stringent modern safety standards while also being comfortable, aerodynamic and long lasting. They are anything but an old-school product, Discovery Channel.
The Roof Carbon is the lightest transformable / mechanical helmet on the market. It's 100 grams lighter than the standard Roof Boxer helmet - that's what you get with carbon, 100 grams. The helmet industry is playing a game of grams, aerodynamics and safety effectiveness in a state of the art way.
If you put a 2000 gram limit on your smart helmet and required it to retain the aerodynamics and size of current lids, it would be in the vicinity of current helmets in terms of usefulness. I doubt it's possible to cram cameras, heads up displays, communications and batteries into a helmet using today's tech, but someday soon? Perhaps.
I saw a tweet today that suggests it's already here in the Cross Helmet. 360° peripheral awareness is a great idea that will no doubt save lives, and having hands free navigational information is another valuable safety feature, but I have a questions about this revolutionary lid.
Most of the articles I've read about the Cross Helmet are by tech websites that have a hard time containing their enthusiasm about disrupting existing industries. They typically suggest that motorcycle helmets haven't changed in decades and that they are low tech, unimaginative things created by Luddites. It'll take the blinding talents of a technology company to interrupt those conservative curmudgeons in the helmet industry (sorry, sometimes the hyperbole around high-tech companies gets a bit tiresome).
Helmets aren't supposed to be an infotainment system, they supposed to be a light-weight, effective protective item that operates in incredibly difficult circumstances. Helmet manufacturers have thrown everything imaginable at this problem, producing carbon fibre helmets and pushing materials engineering to the limit in creating the lightest, most protective lids possible. They've also applied modern aerodynamic analysis to their products, producing quieter, less buffeting protection than ever before. To call them uninspired and backwards simply isn't true.
The most concerning thing about the Cross Helmet isn't the wiz-bang technology in the thing, it's the thing itself. That is a massive lid. When was the last time you needed two hands to hold on to your helmet? This size is a function of all the technology crammed into it. A heads up display, rear facing camera, wireless connectivity, communications and the battery needed to power all that stuff weighs down the helmet and makes it big. The actual weight of it appears to be a mystery. Modern helmets weigh between one and two kilos, with the heaviest ones being mechanical flip top items with built in sun visors. I can't find a weight listed for the Cross Helmet anywhere, not even on their website.
... that's all you get for technical details. |
I get that the first prototype of a new design is going to have problems; this is the worst smart helmet you'll ever see because it's the first one. As the tech gets smaller and designs improve, a smart helmet becomes a much more attractive idea, but I'm disinclined to dive into a (very) expensive helmet that is more of a concept than a usable thing.
Here is a list of some helmets currently on the market with their weights:
Arai DT-X 1619 grams (and check out the many technical details shared)
Roof Boxer Helmet 1650 grams (again with many technical details shared)
Roof Boxer Carbon 1550 grams (the lightest transformable/mechanical helmet I can find)
Nexx Carbon 1219 grams (the lightest helmet I can find)
Shark Evoline 1960 grams (the heaviest helmet I could find)
The lightest of them use every materials engineering trick in the book to produce helmets that meet stringent modern safety standards while also being comfortable, aerodynamic and long lasting. They are anything but an old-school product, Discovery Channel.
The Roof Carbon is the lightest transformable / mechanical helmet on the market. It's 100 grams lighter than the standard Roof Boxer helmet - that's what you get with carbon, 100 grams. The helmet industry is playing a game of grams, aerodynamics and safety effectiveness in a state of the art way.
If you put a 2000 gram limit on your smart helmet and required it to retain the aerodynamics and size of current lids, it would be in the vicinity of current helmets in terms of usefulness. I doubt it's possible to cram cameras, heads up displays, communications and batteries into a helmet using today's tech, but someday soon? Perhaps.
Under those awesome graphics are state of the art materials engineering resulting in unprecedented protection. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)